Non-public land possession usually raises questions relating to the extent of 1’s rights. Fishing in a privately owned physique of water located fully inside one’s property strains usually differs from fishing in public waters and even shared non-public waters. Laws relating to fishing licenses typically pertain to waters managed by state or federal businesses, designed to preserve fish populations and guarantee sustainable fishing practices. Nonetheless, the applicability of those rules to completely non-public, self-contained our bodies of water can fluctuate considerably by jurisdiction. For example, a small, stocked pond fully inside a non-public property’s boundaries could be exempt from licensing necessities in some areas, whereas a bigger lake, even when privately owned, may nonetheless fall below state rules. Understanding the particular rules relevant to the native space is essential.
Clarifying fishing rules on non-public property is essential for each landowners and anglers. For property house owners, it defines the permissible use of their land and assets, permitting them to handle their property successfully and inside authorized boundaries. From an angler’s perspective, understanding these rules prevents unintentional violations, potential fines, and contributes to accountable useful resource administration. Traditionally, fishing rights have been a fancy topic, influenced by each frequent regulation ideas and evolving statutory rules reflecting altering environmental and social concerns. This historic context informs the present authorized panorama surrounding fishing rights on non-public property.
The next sections will delve deeper into the specifics of fishing rules on non-public property, together with variations by state, frequent misconceptions, and the steps obligatory to make sure compliance with related legal guidelines. Moreover, steering on researching native rules and assets for acquiring correct and up-to-date data shall be supplied.
1. Property Boundaries
A elementary facet of figuring out fishing license necessities on non-public property hinges on clearly outlined property boundaries. Understanding the place one’s property begins and ends is essential for ascertaining whether or not a physique of water falls fully inside non-public possession or intersects with public lands or different non-public properties. Ambiguous or disputed boundaries can result in authorized problems relating to fishing rights and potential violations.
-
Full Encapsulation
When a physique of water is absolutely contained inside a property’s boundaries, the landowner usually has higher management over fishing actions. This situation usually reduces the necessity for traditional fishing licenses, though different rules, similar to catch limits or species restrictions, would possibly nonetheless apply relying on native legal guidelines. An instance features a small, synthetic pond constructed fully inside a privately owned parcel of land.
-
Boundary Intersection with Public Waters
If a property boundary intersects with a public waterway, similar to a river or lake, totally different rules apply. Even when a portion of the water physique falls throughout the property strains, fishing in that part would possibly nonetheless require a normal fishing license, because it’s thought-about a part of the general public useful resource. This additionally applies to conditions the place a non-public property borders a navigable waterway, the place public entry and fishing rights are sometimes assured by regulation. An instance features a property bordering a state-managed river.
-
Shared Non-public Waters
In circumstances the place a physique of water is shared by a number of property house owners, fishing rules can develop into extra complicated. Agreements or easements amongst landowners usually dictate fishing entry and licensing necessities. Disputes over boundaries or fishing rights in shared waters can necessitate authorized intervention. An instance is a lake bordered by a number of non-public properties.
-
Subsurface Water Rights
Whereas much less immediately associated to floor fishing, subsurface water rights can affect rules. Legal guidelines governing groundwater or underground streams would possibly influence the legality of setting up or altering our bodies of water used for fishing, even inside one’s property boundaries. These rules fluctuate significantly by area and might affect floor water options linked to subsurface flows. An instance contains rules relating to the development of a pond fed by an underground spring.
Exact property surveys and authorized documentation are essential for establishing clear boundaries. This readability, in flip, clarifies the appliance of fishing license necessities and helps forestall disputes. Ambiguous boundaries not solely create uncertainty relating to fishing rules however may also complicate property transactions and different land administration actions. Subsequently, establishing definitive property boundaries is important for understanding and complying with fishing rules on non-public property.
2. Water Supply Kind
The character of the water supply on non-public property considerably influences fishing rules and licensing necessities. Distinguishing between pure and synthetic water our bodies, in addition to understanding the implications of their connection to public waters, is essential for figuring out whether or not a fishing license is important.
-
Naturally Occurring Lakes and Ponds
Naturally occurring lakes and ponds, even these fully enclosed inside non-public property, are sometimes topic to state fishing rules. This stems from the ecological significance of those water our bodies and the necessity to handle fish populations. Consequently, a fishing license is normally required, even on non-public land, except particular exemptions exist inside state regulation. For example, a big pure pond supporting a various ecosystem could be deemed a public useful resource no matter non-public land possession.
-
Synthetic Ponds and Impoundments
Synthetic ponds and impoundments constructed on non-public land usually provide landowners higher management over fishing actions. If the water supply is fully self-contained and does not hook up with public waters, licensing necessities could also be relaxed. That is notably true for small, privately stocked ponds supposed for leisure fishing. Nonetheless, rules relating to launched species, water utilization, and environmental influence would possibly nonetheless apply. An instance could be a man-made pond crammed by rainwater assortment.
-
Flowing Water Sources (Streams and Rivers)
Navigable streams and rivers, even these traversing non-public property, are typically thought-about public assets. Subsequently, fishing in these waters nearly all the time necessitates a fishing license, no matter land possession. The definition of “navigable” can fluctuate by state and authorized precedent. Even non-navigable sections of streams could be topic to rules in the event that they hook up with downstream public waters, as they contribute to the general ecosystem. An instance is a creek flowing via non-public property that ultimately joins a bigger, publicly accessible river.
-
Groundwater-Fed Our bodies of Water
Water our bodies fed by groundwater, similar to spring-fed ponds, current a fancy situation. Whereas the floor characteristic could be fully inside non-public property, the supply of the water could possibly be topic to separate rules associated to groundwater utilization and conservation. These rules would possibly not directly affect fishing actions and licensing necessities, particularly in areas with restricted water assets. An instance could be a pond crammed by an underground spring, the place water utilization rules may prohibit fishing actions.
Understanding the kind of water supply and its interplay with public assets is due to this fact a vital consider figuring out the need of a fishing license on non-public property. Consulting native and state rules particular to the water supply kind clarifies the authorized necessities for fishing and ensures compliance with related legal guidelines.
3. State Laws
State rules play a pivotal position in figuring out whether or not a fishing license is required on non-public property. These rules fluctuate considerably throughout jurisdictions, reflecting differing conservation priorities, authorized traditions, and the particular traits of native water assets. Understanding these rules is important for each landowners and anglers to make sure compliance and accountable useful resource administration.
-
Possession vs. Jurisdiction
Whereas non-public land possession confers sure rights, it doesn’t essentially exempt landowners from state jurisdiction over wildlife and pure assets. States maintain authority to manage fishing actions to guard fish populations and keep ecological steadiness, even inside privately owned waters. For instance, a state would possibly require permits for stocking non-public ponds with sure fish species or impose catch limits even on privately owned lakes. These rules apply no matter property possession, emphasizing the state’s position in conservation.
-
Navigable Waters and Public Belief Doctrine
The Public Belief Doctrine, a authorized precept prevalent in lots of states, establishes public possession of navigable waters and ensures public entry for actions like fishing and navigation. Even when a portion of a navigable waterway flows via non-public property, a fishing license is usually required, because the state maintains jurisdiction over these waters for the advantage of the general public. This doctrine emphasizes the general public’s proper to entry and make the most of shared assets, no matter adjoining non-public land possession.
-
Species-Particular Laws
State rules usually embody species-specific guidelines associated to fishing seasons, measurement limits, and catch limits. These rules can apply equally to private and non-private waters, as they purpose to guard particular fish populations and stop overfishing. For instance, a state would possibly prohibit catching a sure endangered fish species, no matter whether or not it is present in a public lake or a privately owned pond. This displays a broader conservation mandate that transcends property boundaries.
-
Non-public Pond Permits and Exemptions
Some states provide permits or exemptions for fishing in privately owned and maintained ponds below particular situations. These would possibly embody necessities for the pond to be fully self-contained, stocked with fish bought from licensed hatcheries, and closed to public entry. Such exemptions acknowledge the landowner’s funding and management over these synthetic ecosystems whereas nonetheless permitting the state to watch potential ecological impacts. Nonetheless, these exemptions fluctuate considerably by state and infrequently contain particular software processes.
Finally, understanding and complying with state rules is paramount for legally fishing on non-public property. These rules, whereas typically complicated, are designed to steadiness non-public property rights with the broader public curiosity in conserving pure assets and sustaining wholesome fish populations. Consulting state wildlife businesses or authorized professionals specializing in pure useful resource regulation gives readability on the particular rules relevant to a selected location and ensures adherence to the regulation.
4. Stocked vs. Pure Fish
The excellence between stocked and pure fish populations inside a non-public physique of water has vital implications for fishing rules and licensing necessities. This distinction influences a state’s authority to manage fishing actions and the landowner’s rights regarding using their property. Understanding this interaction is essential for navigating the authorized panorama of fishing on non-public land.
-
Stocked Fish and Non-public Property Rights
Fish stocked in a privately owned and maintained physique of water, similar to a pond constructed solely for leisure fishing, are sometimes thought-about non-public property. This means that state jurisdiction over these fish could be restricted, doubtlessly lowering the necessity for the standard fishing license. For example, a landowner who purchases fish from a industrial hatchery and introduces them right into a self-contained, synthetic pond usually workouts higher management over these fish than over naturally occurring populations. This precept aligns with broader property rights ideas, the place house owners typically management assets launched onto their land.
-
Pure Fish and State Administration
Naturally occurring fish populations, even inside privately owned water our bodies, are typically topic to state rules. States maintain the authority to handle wildlife assets, together with fish, to make sure conservation and keep wholesome ecosystems. Subsequently, fishing for naturally occurring fish, even inside non-public property boundaries, usually requires a fishing license. For instance, if a pure stream flows via non-public property and accommodates native fish, state fishing rules, together with licensing necessities, usually apply. This displays the state’s duty to guard and handle shared pure assets.
-
Intermingling of Stocked and Pure Fish
Conditions the place stocked fish intermingle with naturally occurring populations in a non-public water physique can create regulatory ambiguities. If stocked fish escape a non-public pond and enter a linked pure waterway, they develop into topic to state jurisdiction and fishing rules. Conversely, if naturally occurring fish migrate right into a privately stocked pond, the landowner’s management over these fish could be restricted. This underscores the complexity of managing interconnected ecosystems and the significance of contemplating potential interactions between stocked and pure fish.
-
Proof of Stocking and Regulatory Compliance
In jurisdictions the place stocking non-public ponds permits for exemptions from customary fishing license necessities, landowners would possibly want to offer documentation proving that the fish have been legally obtained and stocked. This documentation may embody receipts from licensed hatcheries or permits issued by state businesses. Sustaining such data is essential for demonstrating compliance with rules and avoiding potential authorized challenges associated to the origin and administration of fish populations in non-public water our bodies.
The excellence between stocked and pure fish is thus a key consider figuring out whether or not a fishing license is required on non-public property. Understanding this distinction, mixed with data of particular state rules and the traits of the water physique, is essential for navigating the complicated intersection of personal property rights and state jurisdiction over fish and wildlife assets. Clarifying this difficulty ensures compliance with related legal guidelines and promotes accountable useful resource administration.
5. Public Entry
Public entry considerably influences fishing rules on non-public property. Figuring out whether or not the general public can legally entry a physique of water, even one positioned inside non-public land boundaries, performs a vital position in establishing jurisdiction and licensing necessities. The presence or absence of public entry immediately impacts the applicability of state fishing rules and the extent of a landowner’s management over fishing actions.
-
Express Public Entry
When a non-public property features a physique of water explicitly designated for public entry, similar to via a public park or designated fishing space, customary fishing license necessities usually apply. Although the underlying land could be privately owned, the general public’s proper to fish in these designated areas necessitates adherence to state rules designed to handle shared assets. An instance features a non-public reservoir permitting public fishing entry for a price, requiring anglers to own legitimate state fishing licenses.
-
Implicit Public Entry (Navigable Waters)
The Public Belief Doctrine establishes public entry rights to navigable waters, no matter adjoining land possession. If a non-public property features a part of a navigable river or lake, the general public typically has the correct to fish in that space, and customary fishing licenses are required. This precept ensures public entry to shared assets and limits the flexibility of personal landowners to limit fishing actions in navigable waters. An instance features a non-public property bordering a navigable river, the place the general public can legally fish from the riverbed, necessitating fishing licenses.
-
Restricted Entry and Non-public Fishing Rights
When a non-public physique of water is fully enclosed inside non-public property and public entry is explicitly restricted, landowners usually have higher management over fishing actions. In these circumstances, state fishing license necessities won’t apply, notably for synthetic ponds stocked with privately bought fish. Nonetheless, different rules, similar to restrictions on launched species or water utilization, may nonetheless be in impact. An instance features a non-public, fenced-off pond used solely by the landowner and their visitors, the place fishing licenses won’t be required.
-
Easements and Rights of Means
Easements or rights of means granting particular people or teams entry to a non-public physique of water for fishing can create complicated regulatory situations. The phrases of the easement usually dictate whether or not customary fishing licenses are required. For example, an easement granted to an area fishing membership would possibly stipulate adherence to state rules, together with licensing, whereas an easement granted to a neighboring property proprietor won’t. Fastidiously reviewing the easement documentation is important to find out relevant fishing rules.
Public entry thus performs a pivotal position in figuring out fishing license necessities on non-public property. The interaction between non-public property rights, public entry rights, and state regulatory authority creates a nuanced authorized panorama. Understanding this interaction is essential for each landowners and anglers looking for to adjust to the regulation whereas having fun with the leisure alternatives provided by non-public water our bodies. Cautious consideration of public entry provisions, alongside session with related authorities, ensures accountable and legally compliant fishing practices.
6. Landowner Rights
Landowner rights considerably affect the query of fishing license necessities on non-public property. Understanding these rights is essential for figuring out the extent of a landowner’s management over fishing actions inside their property boundaries and the way these rights work together with state rules governing fish and wildlife. The next sides discover the complicated relationship between landowner rights and fishing license necessities.
-
Proper to Exclude
Landowners typically possess the correct to exclude others from their property. This elementary proper permits them to manage entry to and use of their land, together with any our bodies of water located fully inside their property strains. Within the context of fishing, this proper can affect whether or not a fishing license is required. If a landowner chooses to limit entry to a non-public pond and permits fishing solely by invited visitors, state fishing license necessities won’t apply. This displays the landowner’s authority to manage actions inside their non-public area. For instance, a non-public, fenced-off pond used solely by the landowner’s household would possible be exempt from customary licensing necessities. Nonetheless, this proper doesn’t supersede state rules regarding public assets, similar to navigable waters or protected species.
-
Proper to Use and Enjoyment
Landowners have the correct to make use of and luxuriate in their property, together with the correct to interact in leisure actions like fishing. This proper, nevertheless, is topic to affordable rules designed to guard public pursuits, similar to environmental safety and useful resource conservation. Whereas a landowner can fish on their very own property, they have to nonetheless adjust to related state rules relating to fishing seasons, catch limits, and species restrictions, even when a license is not required. For instance, even on a non-public pond exempt from licensing necessities, rules defending endangered species would nonetheless apply. This balances the landowner’s proper to enjoyment with broader conservation objectives.
-
Proper to Handle Assets
Landowners usually have the correct to handle assets on their property, together with fish populations in non-public ponds. This proper would possibly embody stocking ponds with commercially obtained fish, implementing administration practices to boost fish populations, or harvesting fish for private consumption. Nonetheless, this proper is restricted by state rules designed to stop the introduction of invasive species, shield native fish populations, and handle water assets. For instance, a landowner would possibly want a allow to inventory a non-public pond with sure fish species, even when they aren’t required to have a fishing license. This oversight ensures accountable useful resource administration and prevents ecological hurt.
-
Limitations on Riparian Rights
Riparian rights, which pertain to land adjoining to water our bodies, can affect fishing entry and use. Whereas riparian landowners usually have sure rights relating to water utilization and entry, these rights are restricted by public belief doctrines and state rules regarding navigable waters and fish administration. Even when a property borders a river, the landowner can not essentially forestall public fishing entry or disregard state fishing rules within the navigable portion of the waterway. These limitations steadiness non-public property rights with the general public curiosity in accessing and using shared assets.
The interaction between landowner rights and state rules creates a fancy authorized framework governing fishing on non-public property. Whereas landowners possess vital management over their property, this management is topic to affordable rules designed to guard public assets and guarantee sustainable fishing practices. Understanding these interconnected elements is important for figuring out whether or not a fishing license is required and for selling accountable and legally compliant fishing actions on non-public land. Cautious consideration of those rights and their limitations, along side particular state rules, gives a complete understanding of the problem and facilitates knowledgeable decision-making relating to fishing on non-public property.
7. Lease Agreements
Lease agreements can considerably influence fishing rights on ostensibly non-public property. A lease settlement successfully transfers sure property rights from the proprietor (lessor) to the tenant (lessee) for a specified interval. Concerning fishing, a lease can both grant or deny fishing rights to the lessee, no matter underlying property possession. Subsequently, even when a property features a non-public pond or lake, the lessee won’t be permitted to fish and not using a license if the lease settlement explicitly excludes such rights. Conversely, a lease may grant unique fishing rights to the lessee, even requiring the property proprietor to acquire a license for private fishing actions. For instance, a landowner leasing their property for agricultural functions would possibly retain fishing rights, requiring anybody else, together with the lessee, to stick to plain licensing necessities. Alternatively, a lease for leisure use may grant unique fishing privileges to the lessee, exempting them from customary licensing if different situations are met, such because the water physique being fully self-contained and stocked with privately bought fish.
The specificity of the lease settlement is paramount. Ambiguous language relating to fishing rights can result in disputes and authorized challenges. A well-drafted lease ought to clearly articulate who holds fishing rights, any relevant restrictions (e.g., catch limits, species restrictions), and whether or not customary fishing licenses are required. This readability protects each the lessor and lessee and ensures compliance with related state rules. Moreover, lease agreements ought to align with current state legal guidelines relating to fishing and water useful resource administration. For instance, a lease can not grant fishing rights for protected or endangered species even when the water physique is fully inside non-public property. Equally, lease agreements can not override public belief doctrines relating to navigable waters. Even when a lease grants unique fishing rights to a lessee, the general public would possibly nonetheless retain entry and fishing privileges in navigable parts of a waterway traversing the leased property.
In conclusion, lease agreements characterize a vital part in figuring out fishing license necessities on non-public property. An intensive understanding of the lease phrases, mixed with consciousness of relevant state rules, is important for each landowners and lessees. This understanding clarifies fishing rights and obligations, prevents potential disputes, and promotes compliance with authorized frameworks governing fishing and useful resource administration. Neglecting to deal with fishing rights inside a lease settlement can create vital ambiguities and potential conflicts. Subsequently, exact and legally sound lease agreements, explicitly addressing fishing rights, are important for managing fishing actions on leased non-public property, balancing the pursuits of landowners, lessees, and the broader public curiosity in useful resource conservation.
Regularly Requested Questions About Fishing on Non-public Property
This part addresses frequent questions and misconceptions relating to fishing licenses and personal property. Readability on these points is essential for each landowners and anglers looking for to navigate the complicated intersection of personal property rights and state fishing rules.
Query 1: Does proudly owning a property routinely grant one the correct to fish and not using a license in any water physique on that property?
Property possession doesn’t routinely exempt people from state fishing rules. Whereas landowners usually have higher management over fully non-public, self-contained water our bodies, naturally occurring water sources and people linked to public waters are usually topic to state jurisdiction, together with licensing necessities.
Query 2: If a stream flows via non-public property, can the landowner forestall others from fishing in it?
If the stream is deemed navigable below state regulation, the general public typically has the correct to fish in it, no matter adjoining non-public land possession. Landowners can not legally forestall public entry to or fishing in navigable waterways.
Query 3: Is a fishing license required in a privately owned, synthetic pond stocked with bought fish?
In lots of jurisdictions, fishing in a totally non-public, synthetic pond stocked with bought fish doesn’t require a normal fishing license. Nonetheless, particular rules relating to stocking permits, launched species, and water utilization would possibly nonetheless apply.
Query 4: If a property borders a lake, does the landowner want a license to fish from their very own shoreline?
If the lake is taken into account public water, a fishing license is mostly required, even when fishing from non-public property alongside the shoreline. The general public belief doctrine usually grants public entry and fishing rights in navigable waters.
Query 5: What constitutes a “navigable” waterway, and the way does this designation have an effect on fishing rights?
The definition of “navigable” varies by state however typically refers to waterways able to supporting industrial or leisure boat site visitors. State regulation and authorized precedent decide navigability, which considerably influences public entry and fishing rights, even inside privately owned sections of the waterway.
Query 6: The place can one discover definitive data relating to fishing license necessities on non-public property in a particular location?
Consulting the state’s wildlife company or division of pure assets gives essentially the most correct and up-to-date data relating to fishing rules, together with licensing necessities on non-public property inside that state. Authorized counsel specializing in property and pure useful resource regulation can provide additional clarification in complicated conditions.
Understanding state-specific rules and the distinctive traits of the water physique are essential for figuring out fishing license necessities on non-public property. Cautious analysis and session with related authorities guarantee compliance and promote accountable useful resource administration.
For additional data on particular situations and authorized interpretations, seek the advice of the assets supplied within the subsequent part.
Suggestions for Understanding Fishing License Necessities on Non-public Property
Navigating the complexities of fishing rules on non-public property requires cautious consideration of assorted elements. The following pointers present steering for landowners and anglers looking for to know and adjust to related legal guidelines.
Tip 1: Analysis State-Particular Laws: Start by totally researching the particular fishing rules of the state in query. State legal guidelines fluctuate considerably relating to non-public property fishing rights, and reliance on generalizations can result in authorized points. Consulting the state’s wildlife company web site or contacting their places of work immediately gives correct and up-to-date data.
Tip 2: Decide Water Physique Kind and Boundaries: Clearly establish the kind of water physique in query (pure or synthetic) and its boundaries. Exact property surveys and authorized documentation assist set up possession and decide the applicability of state rules. A small, fully self-contained, synthetic pond differs considerably from a pure stream or lake, even when positioned inside non-public property.
Tip 3: Assess Public Entry: Consider whether or not the general public has authorized entry to the water physique. Public entry, even to a portion of a privately owned water physique, can set off state jurisdiction and licensing necessities. The Public Belief Doctrine, making use of to navigable waters, ensures public entry and infrequently necessitates fishing licenses even when fishing from non-public property bordering such waters.
Tip 4: Evaluate Lease Agreements Fastidiously: If the property is leased, rigorously evaluate the lease settlement for particular provisions relating to fishing rights. Lease agreements can grant or deny fishing rights no matter underlying property possession. Readability throughout the lease prevents disputes and ensures all events perceive their rights and obligations.
Tip 5: Perceive Stocked vs. Pure Fish Implications: Distinguish between stocked and naturally occurring fish populations. Laws usually differ based mostly on the origin of the fish. Stocked fish in a non-public, self-contained pond won’t require a license, whereas fishing for pure populations, even inside non-public property, usually falls below state jurisdiction.
Tip 6: Doc Stocking Procedures: If counting on an exemption for stocked fish, keep documentation proving the authorized acquisition and stocking of the fish. Receipts from licensed hatcheries and related permits display compliance with state rules and stop potential authorized challenges.
Tip 7: Search Skilled Recommendation When Needed: Seek the advice of with authorized counsel specializing in property and pure useful resource regulation for complicated conditions or unclear rules. Skilled steering ensures correct interpretation of relevant legal guidelines and minimizes the danger of authorized problems.
By following the following tips, landowners and anglers can perceive the nuances of fishing on non-public property, making certain compliance with state rules and selling accountable useful resource administration. This proactive strategy protects particular person rights and contributes to the long-term well being of aquatic ecosystems.
The ultimate part concludes this exploration of fishing on non-public property, providing remaining suggestions and emphasizing the significance of accountable useful resource stewardship.
Conclusion
Figuring out whether or not a fishing license is required on non-public property hinges on a fancy interaction of things. Property boundaries, water supply kind, state-specific rules, the origin of fish populations (stocked versus pure), public entry provisions, landowner rights, and lease agreements all contribute to this intricate authorized panorama. Navigating these complexities requires cautious consideration of every component and diligent analysis into relevant state legal guidelines. Whereas non-public land possession grants sure rights, it doesn’t routinely exempt people from state jurisdiction over fish and wildlife assets. The general public belief doctrine, navigable waters, and species-specific rules usually supersede non-public property rights, emphasizing the significance of understanding the broader authorized and ecological context.
Accountable useful resource administration and compliance with fishing rules are essential for preserving aquatic ecosystems and making certain sustainable fishing practices for future generations. Readability relating to fishing license necessities on non-public property protects each landowners and anglers, fostering a harmonious relationship between non-public property rights and the general public curiosity in conserving shared pure assets. Proactive engagement with state wildlife businesses and, when obligatory, authorized professionals specializing in property and pure useful resource regulation, ensures knowledgeable decision-making and fosters a local weather of respect for each non-public property and the broader ecological good.
